Quote of the Month
AOPA-SA has been strident in its attacks on various South African general aviation organisations.
Paul van Tellingen of Aviation Watch SA has been a steadfast critic of AOPA and in particular, its Chairman, Dr Koos Marais.
Paul wrote of the doctor;
‘Nou blaf hy vir alles en almal soos ‘n klein brakkie en kry die hele buurt in rep en roer.” (Now he is barking at everything and everyone like a little mongrel and getting the whole neighbourhood in an uproar.)
Home / This Month’s mag / Features
Features
 Discovered on Bapsfontein plotArguably one of the world’s weirdest aeroplanes, the PL-12 was, for a short period, a great success. Designed to replace the venerable Tiger Moth topdressers that were once hugely popular amongst New Zealand aerial applicators, the Airtruk’s many qualities were soon eclipsed by larger capacity ag-aircraft powered by big radial engines
To be remembered as the designer of the world’s ugliest aeroplane is perhaps a legacy Italian Luigi Pellarini would not have wanted when he passed away in 2002. His memory remains in the shape of the whacky Transavia PL-12 Airtruk; a twin-boomed single-engine ag-aircraft built around a substantial 400-litre hopper situated behind and below the pilot. Few know that a single African example of his design remains on a Bapsfontein plot some 30 kilometres outside Johannesburg, where it’s tucked under a shade net and trees, as part of a small but fascinating collection of aeroplanes belonging to retired airline pilot, John ‘Fluffy’ McKerchar.
Pellarini, it is said, left Italy for Australia in somewhat of a huff, unable to attract financing for his road-driveable aeroplanes, which had become fashionable, if impractical, in the years immediately following World War Two. The designer’s signature project was a PL-2C cabin pusher-propeller monoplane with folding wings and a narrow tricycle undercarriage. The mind boggles at the notion of the slender wheel track providing enough stability on Europe’s narrow and twisting roads for the wing-less aeroplane.
Despite the practical barriers to an aeroplane which could be driven on roads, Pellarini managed to build at least one PL-2C in 1946. There were a handful of other designs, most of which were never realised, before Pellarini’s financiers lost interest. The Italian, who boasted that his later PL-5 flying car had flown 250 hours and had been driven over 8,000 kilometres, arrived in Australia as an embittered Italian immigrant, according to historian DG Cameron. His two PL-5s had been left behind, one surviving until the early seventies, until eventually lost in a hangar fire.
In Australia Pellarini took up from where he had left off, designing unconventional flying machines.
In 1955, encouraged by a commission to design an agricultural aircraft, he applied his fertile mind to producing something truly practical, if unusual. His interpretation was to simply build a metal hopper and attach an engine, biplane wings, boomed tailplane and cockpit. This was Pellarini’s PL-7, which flew for the first time in September 1956. A 400hp Armstrong Siddeley Cheetah-10 engine was hung on the airframe, and surprisingly, it was reported to be easy to fly. Another fire at Bankstown Airport was to claim the sole prototype, which led the Italian to design a further ag-aircraft, the PL-11.
The PL-11 was inspired by the sudden availability of some ex-New Zealand air force Harvard components. They were thoughtfully acquired by a Te Kuiti, New Zealand engineer, George ‘Snow’ Bennett, who had spotted the potential for using their engines and other components to build a new aeroplane. Thus the radial engined PL-11 was born, using the Harvard’s R-1340 Wasp engine and various other components that included one of the canopy frames. Both of the two completed Bennett PL-11s were destroyed in accidents, and Pellerini was approached by a new company, Transavia, to improve on the PL-11. Bennett, now out of pocket, joined the new team.
Using the PL-11’s weight-saving and corrosion-resistant twin-boom layout, Pellarini’s new PL-12 Airtruk was to prove New Zealand’s first successful commercial aircraft design. Its appearance and clever features appealed to New Zealand’s operators whose curiosity was aroused sufficiently for local topdressing flyers to eventually buy almost 30. A total of 118 of the various models was produced until Transavia closed in 1993.
The Airtruk might have been extraordinarily ugly, but it was otherwise a fine aeroplane. Strong, and with good handling qualities, especially in the slow speed regime, it did however have a very noisy cockpit. The frontal area is built using molybdenum tubing bolted to a metal and glass-fibre hopper structure which supported a large rear-fuselage moulding designed to carry a pair of loaders and any field support equipment. In fact it is possible to stand up in the rear cabin, and Transavia even produced a utility version, replacing the hopper area with seating for a further three occupants. The undercarriage legs are interchangeable, as are the ailerons and flaps.
Mooney-type rubber shock absorbers gave the PL-12 a bouncy ride on rough surfaces. The hopper was filled by driving a chemical dispenser between the two booms, and filling the 36 cubic/feet tank directly. Like Pellarini’s previous agricultural aeroplanes, the PL-12 Airtruk’s inherent strength relied on a stout hopper, fashioned, unconventionally, from steel. The hopper was attached to a sesquiplane, itself consisting of a D-section steel leading edge and supporting struts that reinforced the undercarriage mountings and carried through the fuselage.
Although New Zealand operators used their Airtruks almost exclusively for superphosphate spreading, export aircraft were fitted with a single point fluid filler on the lower fuselage. However, trying to stem liquid leaks in an ag-aircraft designed for solids was an ongoing challenge. Cruising at a modest 100 knots, the PL-12 could easily lift its own weight on the power of its single Continental IO-520 engine.
Three aircraft were sold to South African buyers. One was written off, and another badly damaged during spraying operations in Natal. Both aircraft eventually found their way to Australia where they were re-built - but crashed again, this time terminally, but without injury to their pilots; the last one only two years ago. The third was originally flown out to South Africa in 1969, using the ferry flight as a demonstration to potential operators along the way. This aircraft, ZS-WPO, was flown out by Roy Williams and was exhibited in the Australian trade pavilion during the Nairobi Agricultural Show, and then a few weeks later, at Cape Town’s Australian trade fair, before being delivered new to Westelike Provinsie Oesbespuiting, run by the Marais family in Malmesbury in the Cape. In 1977 the Marais` sold it to Agricura, and it eventually passed to Orsmond Aviation. The corrosive effect of chemicals eventually grounded the aircraft due to a difficult hopper/airframe repair and, having been parked at Bethlehem, the Airtruk was sold to well-known airline pilot, Fluffy McKerchar, who collected it on a trailer, removing both tailplanes as well as the fibreglass rear cabin.
The Agtruk flew many hours under the care of Eugene Marais, whose dad bought the aeroplane. Now a doctor practicing in Mossel Bay, Doc Marais is South Africa’s only pilot to have earned a Master’s Degree from Stellenbosch University in Entomology, specialising in aerial spray patterns. The Agtruk “cost my dad R16,000 new”, recalls Eugene, who once attracted unwelcome attention from Danie Craven after landing a Piper Pawnee on the university’s rugby pitch. “The hopper was really designed for dry chemicals rather than liquids, and it was always a problem to stop leaks when we used it for fluids”.
Eugene, now seventy years old, remembers the Agtruk’s many advantages: “We loved the rear cabin, with which we could carry around our equipment as well as ground crew. It often saved us having to drive our bakkie to wherever we were spraying. We could easily fix a ferry tank in the hopper to give us a 12-hour endurance. My dad did not believe in radios as we were flying low level all the time, although I recall the controllers getting peeved with us when we passed Jan Smuts one day. The airspace was very quiet in the seventies, and we would occasionally fly into Bloemfontein or elsewhere without having radio contact”.
The Agtruk was carefully looked after during its tenure with the Marais family although there were a couple of incidents. Eugene recounts, “I was spraying in the Cederburg one day and had to jettison the load following a sudden change of wind direction as I was spraying directly towards a mountain ridge. 200 feet below the ridge, I realised I was not going to make it, even with an empty hopper. I managed to put the aeroplane down on a narrow and rocky 100-foot stretch of relatively flat surface, with a precipice on the approach and the mountain side at the far end. Just as I stopped, the wing caught a Protea plant which dented the leading edge. The farmer managed to get his tractor up to the aeroplane, and using a length of heavy steel railway track, smoothed a surface for me to turn the aeroplane around and takeoff once we had patched up the wing. The 3000 feet sheer drop helped to get my flying speed up at the end of the takeoff run. We also bent the undercarriage running across an Aardvark hole one day and flew the lopsided Agtruk around for a few hours before the factory told us to re-heat the leg and bend it back again - perfectly safely, which we did.”
“It was great to fly”, says Eugene. “I shortened the stick so I could rest my forearm on my knee. I used to visit the zoo when I was a youngster and ride the elephants. The cockpit reminded me of those wonderful school years as it’s the highest point so it was easy to manoeuvre below wires in those days. We were sad to sell it, but the new Grumman Ag-Cats could lift much more weight”.
Fluffy intended to fly the aircraft but realised that the restoration project would be a lot less fun than his many other retirement activities, which include motor racing, car restoration, and model boat sailing. The Airtruk thus remains parked under shade netting on his plot, awaiting an enthusiastic and committed aircraft tinkerer who might restore it to an airworthy condition.
The aircraft would make a worthy air show performer for an enthusiast willing to invest in its future. Fluffy says he still has engines for the aircraft but can’t recall exactly when he acquired them.
John ‘Fluffy’ McKerchar:
1977 Air race winner
I didn’t want to spend my retirement years playing golf”, says 65-year old John ‘Fluffy’ McKerchar, who last flew Airbus A340s with South African Airways. He left SAA in May 2006, following an illustrious career as a flight engineer, and then pilot on the Hawker 748, Boeing 707, 727s and 747. He will long be known as the pilot who flew a single-seat homebuilt to victory in the 1977 State President`s Air Race; notoriously difficult for a two-crew cockpit, never mind a single-seater.
Fluffy still has his race-winning Taylor Titch, ZS-UDZ, built by Fanie van Rensburg in 1972. “It flew nicely”, he says. “However, it could be challenging to land with its unusual sprung steel undercarriage. Nick Turvey pointedly asked me how many hours I had, after he insisted on conducting a handicap test flight on the aeroplane prior to its race win. With lots of glider-flying experience, I managed to fly it on the rev-counter alone, taking advantage of every updraft. 3000 rpm on its 108 hp O-235 Lycoming, was the sweet spot, and I managed to achieve 166 mph against a handicap of 156 mph. I was never more than a quarter of a mile off track on the course which ran between the start at Baragwanath to finish at Durban’s Virginia the next day. I had flown the Titch some 700 hours and knew it very well - it’s demanding handling during landing was its only Achilles heel”, Fluffy says.
Fluffy now indulges himself in his many restoration and building projects - many of them motor cars. He also loves to race model yachts and, in his younger days, raced power boats. His aeroplane collection not only includes the Airtruk and Taylor Titch - he also has a rare Jodel Bebe, ZS-UIJ; a Volmer Jensen ultralight powered by a 10 hp Rockwell Powerbee engine; a Nieuport 11 World War One airframe; an Avid Flyer, ZS-VLB; Hyperlite homebuilt, ZS-WCP; 1934 Kirby Kite sailplane, ZS-GAM; a rare Motor Spatz motor glider, and a Falke SF25B. He also has the completed fuselage tub of a Flying Flea hanging from his workshop roof, and under a pile of aircraft parts, an unfinished 7/8th scale Spitfire homebuilt.
With aircraft a fairly low priority, Fluffy is charged up about finishing one of his many car projects - an original 1974 European Formula Atlantic Modus, once driven successfully by young Formula One racing driver, Tony Brise, who lost his life in the accident which killed Graham Hill at Elstree Airport in 1975. The racing car and its Cosworth BDA engine, and valuable Hewland gearbox, is being prepared for a historic racing event later this year.
|
|

Turbo Airvan Australia’s Ute gets more muscle
Now with big backing from Mahindra, Gippsaero is making waves with its new turbocharged GA8 TC-320 Airvan. The extra muscle and quieter cabin add great value
It’s now nine years since I trekked with Pat Hanly around Botswana on an aircraft sales tour. The occasion was a successful attempt at convincing a collection of hardnosed tour operators that the then new Australian manufactured GippsAero GA8 Airvan was going to earn them some money.
Pat had already paid his dues selling Mooneys, and had established an unusual reputation in the business for being a straight talker, and a guy who can be trusted to deliver on his promises. Whilst Mooney production has been knocked hard by the 2008 recession, his energy was redirected towards selling a model that people needed, rather than desired. Since 2002, Pat has sold 24 Airvans - all at the expense of Cessna’s 206 Stationair, which has been a well-entrenched if somewhat elderly industry standard.
When Cessna returned the 206 to production in 1998, the utility piston gap between the Australian aeroplane and Cessna’s finest bush carrier had widened. Cessna took their 206 upmarket rather than appeasing the relatively small but hitherto loyal operators who relied on the Stationair to earn them a living. The spiffy leather and carpeted interiors with fashionable fabrics might have widened the market at home for Cessna and made the aircraft more appealing to the company’s core private buyers, but the ‘improvements’ also added weight, thus lessening the 206’s utility.
Airvan in turn upped the game for this class of aircraft. When it was introduced, there was little that utility operators could find to criticize, apart from the price, and lack of a track record. The GA8 presented them with a seven-passenger cabin, centre aisle, vast rear loading door, and a pair of crew doors and picture windows no tour operator- in this day of digital photography- could resist.
The lack of a cargo pod on early versions was also an operator criticism, and the picky ones even mentioned the Airvan’s lack of a certified autopilot. Having substantially shallower pockets than Cessna, improving the GA8 has been a somewhat slow process. A cargo pod was only certified and introduced in 2006 - the autopilot a little later. By this time, the aircraft had begun to sell in decent quantities, helped by a substantial order from Cessna’s home country in the form of 33 aeroplanes for the US Civil Air Patrol.
In Africa, tour operators in Moçambique and Botswana were quick to see the benefits of two additional seats, although there were natural reservations about the Airvan’s longevity and resistance to low time pilots in harsh wilderness conditions. These two concerns proved groundless as some of the worldwide fleet head beyond 6000 flying hours, with Botswana operators regularly flying their aircraft over 70 hours per month during their busy season.
It’s a considerable testament to the product that nine years on, Airvans are still selling. It has been impossible to distort the type’s role in the bar room with such a cross-section of operators relying on the aircraft to earn them money; and when GippsAero announced the certification of their new turbocharged model in 2010, Pat Hanly ordered a demonstrator, mindful that its extra 200lb carrying capacity and enhanced cruising speed would open a few more doors in remotest Africa.
At around R6 million, investing in a demo model is not a decision to take lightly, but given Pat’s sales record, he was confident he could find a buyer for the first model of its type in Africa. When it arrived in Coega (probably the first aircraft delivered via the new port), the Airvan was unpacked without panel instruments. SA Mooney is the only distributor that imports aircraft and installs the panel, and indeed ZS-BMT is the first Airvan to be fitted with a flat screen Bendix KFD840 Primary Flight Display. Everyone knows that in today’s over-legislated world, carrying out an STC approval is an exercise mired in a vast weight of paperwork. Thankfully Bendix King/Honeywell underwrote the cost of the STC. The KFD 840 costs some US$12,000 plus installation. In addition, BMT is fitted with a GMA340, GNS530, GNS430, a GTX327 transponder, and that most desirable of cockpit aids: an S-Tec 50 autopilot.
Overall, there’s very little to tell about the new turbo GA8 TC320. Improvements have been subtle engineering changes like the fuel filtering system - instead of having separate fuel bowls they have a cast aluminium system. Horizontal stabiliser bearing support brackets have been changed to enable easier servicing and to provide greater longevity. There’s also a changed nosewheel with high flotation tyres. The turbocharged model also brings a standard three-blade prop and sizeable cowl flap to handle the greater temperature variations. The cowl profile is the same, bar the flap and air intake, which has bestowed a more purposeful look, rather than the ‘fish’ shaped nose bowl on normally aspirated examples. There has also been a modification carried out to the front seats that enables greater rearwards travel.
For those used to Cessna’s higher performance singles, the GA8 appears to be a substantial aeroplane. Powered by a 320hp TIO-540 engine, it requires a step to climb into the front seats - not unlike a Caravan. The panel itself has always had an RV quality with its unadorned but not unattractive metal finish with exposed rivet heads. Finished in a suitably neutral grey, the centre section is angled towards the pilot. It’s very different to a Cessna’s tailored panel where the Wichita models continue to benefit from almost car-like instrument panel finishes. The Australians, budget challenged, have not had the luxury of years of accumulated wealth and a common panel design. However, it works and in many respects suits the Airvan’s utilitarian character.
An airliner-sized centre console handles the elevator trim, power, propeller and mixture. The handbrake plunger is mounted on top, and a somewhat out of sight, out of mind, cowl flap lever is located at the back. This operates in a simple ‘up’ for open and ‘down’ for closed, and will likely be forgotten by normally aspirated GA8 pilots not paying attention to their climb and descent checks. In fact the cowl flap has a significant effect on cruise speed - at least five knots, which for a sub 140-knot aeroplane makes quite a difference. A good old three-position mechanical flap lever will bring a smile to old and new hands alike, and will probably receive a nod of approval as well from maintenance engineers used to ordering replacement flap motors at huge expense. Indeed, the Aussies have made liberal use of substantial plungers and levers around the cockpit - it’s probably an ‘Aussie-thing’ - and in my view, all the better for it.
There’s an overall sense of the pilot having his own workspace in the Airvan. The cockpit is very wide, and the expanse will almost make a busy charter pilot feel he’s on the first airliner rung. As I was to discover, the ‘big’ aeroplane-feel stops right there, and despite its half-Caravan size, operators universally agree, the GA8 has provided a welcome and easy step up from a 206 in terms of general handling qualities, making life easier for young pilots.
From cold, the big Lycoming starts easily. The usual juggling over mixture and throttle setting is called for when cranking from hot, and should not present any problems to pilots used to busy drop-off and pick-up routines. The door shutting travails of Cessnas are largely forgotten with the Airvan’s expansive front doors for both front-seaters, and a vast sliding door at the back. The front doors open and latch against the cowling for taxying on those really hot days - lovely and a real bargain during those 30-degree-plus days often found in sub-Saharan tourist areas. The rear door slides beautifully and is easily closed and latched from the inside or outside. The rear door can also be opened and closed in flight, making the GA8 an excellent photography or skydiving platform - it is a tremendous feature.
Nosewheel steering is heavyish but the ride is springy on the pliant, single-tube main legs and oversize tyres. Manoeuvrability is fine. The nosewheel leg appears over-engineered but is designed for the aircraft to continue operating in the event of the oleo losing pressure. A large internal spring takes care of normal shock loads in the event of an oil leak and until the aircraft can get to a handy AMO. However, there hasn’t yet been a reported Airvan oleo failure.
The big question of course is how the Airvan operates at gross weight, and just how far it will fly with varying numbers of filled seats and luggage?
The turbocharged model has what at first seems to be a 200lb increase in gross weight. However, the landing weight is limited, which means the 200 pounds has to be shed before returning to the ground - that’s 33 gallons, or just under two hours of fuel. The cargo pod handles 440 pounds, and the rear cabin luggage area 300lbs. I would expect commercially flown Airvans to weigh in slightly less than the privately-owned ZS-BMT, so 1,900 lbs of payload is perhaps a practical rounded-up figure for how much can be loaded into the GA8.
Each tank in the thinnish but obviously efficient wing holds 44.9 gallons of Avgas for a total of 340 litres. That translates to 540 pounds of fuel, leaving a useful load of 1360 pounds with full tanks. That allows for seven and-a-half 180lb people to occupy the eight seat cabin without luggage. This begs the question of whether operators will want to load six passengers plus a pilot over a distance of up to four and-a-half hours or so. It is doubtful any operator will use this aircraft for lengthy trips because of its relatively low cruise numbers and lack of a toilet. However, the cabin is easily comfortable enough for this length of time - certainly more than a Cessna 206 or 210.
Thus, the Airvan is perhaps optimised for up to two-hour legs with six passengers. This doesn’t allow a pod full of heavy luggage, but if six passengers can get by with 20lbs of luggage each, the Airvan will work nicely, provided any ladies are honest about their weight. Whatever the limitations, the Airvan is obviously far more flexible than Cessna’s finest station wagons.
Charter operators are used to juggling numbers with their weight and balance calculations - and being obsessive about costs - but what about private owners? A number of GA8s have been purchased by private operators - many of them enthusiastic conservationists. The aircraft is very much at home in the bush, and loading unusually-sized cargo into the aircraft, even in the form of drugged wild animals, presents no challenges. The Airvan is also a tremendous method of transport for a family wanting to holiday in the bush with children and perhaps a couple of friends. Like all unpressurised utility aircraft though, it is advisable to depart early in the morning so passengers will enjoy the splendid views from the huge windows without suffering turbulence-induced motion sickness.
Perhaps the easiest thing to write about the Airvan is the plain vanilla handling that even a Cessna 172 pilot would feel at home with. Get used to the slightly heavyish controls and high lift wing, which feels every bump, and a conversion will be easily signed off. Trimmed correctly, the GA8 flies itself off the ground without drama, and will climb comfortably at light plane speeds around the 90-100 knot mark. Level off, then allow the aircraft to accelerate in the cruise and the temperatures to stabilise, before shutting the cowl flap, and the airspeed indicator nudges all the way to 138 knots TAS - about the same a trusty Cessna 182.
I wish all flight reports were as simple as the Airvan’s. It is a highly predictable aeroplane to fly - mechanically simple to control with the three-position flaps, and easy to pin down circuit and approach speeds. The only small anomaly is the relative neutral stability in pitch, with little need for major trim changes with flap application.
This is a solid and simple aeroplane to fly, with no vices, and is also easy to land using a classic Cessna technique of raising the nose at the flare and allowing the speed to bleed off to touch down on the mainwheels, just like a common-or-garden 172.
If GippsAero can be accused of anything, it’s their slow approach to improving its product lines. Much of this is because it simply does not have the financial clout to develop the airframe quickly. The robust cargo pod for instance was long overdue, as is the turbocharged version of the GA8. There are some enduring grumbles about braking efficiency and seat comfort. The company, of which Indian conglomerate, Mahindra, acquired a controlling interest in 2009, is now not short of investment, and so has been steadily improving various weaknesses.
Typical of these are the passenger door slider and fuel filter system, as well as other small tweaks. GippsAero has also been let down by poor service issues from Lycoming, which is in today’s distressed GA industry. However, this is not a type specific gripe, but is related to US supplier issues.
Although the Airvan is possibly as close to a conservationist’s nirvana as it is possible for a light aircraft to get, the manufacturer and South African agent, Airvan Africa, is just as keen to see the new turbocharged model appear amongst the fleets of tour operators in the region. Pat Hanly, who has built a trusted reputation selling the GA8, as well as Mooneys in Southern Africa, reckons there’s a market for up to four new Airvans a year.
With continuing improvements and the ongoing development of the Rolls Royce-engined turbine GA10 model (and twin turbine development of the old Australian GAF Nomad utility aircraft), the aeroplane’s future seems to be assured.
Despite its sticker price, it seems to have become the aspirational type in the areas most suited to its unbeatable qualities of carrying people around in the most spacious cabin, with the ease of handling found in the most popular small singles.
It obviously works, as Cessna has been completely out-manoeuvred in many wilderness tour areas - Maun, Botswana being a prime example.
|
|
Evelyn Frederick "Bok" Driver |
|
|
|

And the South African Airmail Centenary
27 Dec 1911 – 27 Dec 2011
One hundred years ago the African Aviation Syndicate devoted a fortnight from the 12 December 1911 to further promote their passion for flight in South Africa
It is hard to imagine a time when most people had not had any live exposure to the wonder of flight. The syndicate, consisting of Guy Livingstone, Cecil Compton-Patterson and my great-grandfather Evelyn Frederick “Bok” Driver, owned two aircraft.
The first, a Farman-type Paterson biplane manufactured by Liverpool Motor House Ltd, was 10 metres in length and span and was powered by a 50 HP Gnome engine. A replica built by Ben Rodriguez can be viewed at the Swartkops Museum in Pretoria. In Kimberley, four kilometres off the N8 on General van der Spuy Drive, a national monument holds a replica in a hangar on the site where the African Aviation Syndicate would later start the first flying school in South Africa. This endeavour eventually led to the formation of the SAAF with the blessing of General JC Smuts. Another fine replica is on view at the Sci Bono Science Centre in Newtown, Gauteng.
The second aircraft, primarily flown by Bok, was a Bleriot XI similar to the one that was flown across the English Channel by Louis Bleriot on 25 July 1909. The aircraft has a wingspan of 8.6 metres and was remarkably conventional in layout and control, with the exception of the use of wing-warping for lateral control as opposed to ailerons. The flying surfaces were covered by Continental Rubber fabric, over which Bok and his wife often laboured. The Bleriot XI was powered by a 3-cylinder fan-shape Anzani motor developing a whopping 23 HP. It drove a 2 metre wooden propeller of 0.8 metres pitch at 1350rpm, giving the 310kg aircraft a cruise speed of 30 knots!
The assembly, repair and modification to the aircraft were carried out by the syndicate members. Both aircraft would later be rebuilt from wrecks by the aviators during a time when about one in four flights in the world resulted in the destruction of the aircraft, and the lifespan of a pilot was miserably short. The resourcefulness, tenacity and determination of these pioneers was remarkable.
Bok was born in Pietermaritzburg in 1887. He attended Hilton College and SACS, where his rugby-playing prowess earned him his nickname. On 1 August, 1911 he earned Aviator’s Certificate No. 110 of the Fédération Aeronautique International.
Bok’s grandson, Dr Jon Driver-Jowitt of Cape Town, provided the following details. He explains how, on 11 and 12 September 1911, his grandfather took part in the Royal Mail Aerial Postal Service flown to mark the coronation of King George V. The mail carried letters for the Royal family, and one addressed to the King, signed by the directors and pilot aviators of the Grahame-White Aviation Company. Bok flew with Clement Gresswell, an Englishman, and Gustav Hamel, of Scandinavian descent. Bok carried most of the mail in his Farman biplane, 11 bags of mail on three flights.
This included specially designed postcards signed by Bok. There was also a letter, signed by the director and aviators of the Grahame-White Aviation Company, in which they wrote: “We believe this important event will become historical and its developments will lead to a communication between the peoples of the world.” The flight was from Hendon aerodrome to Windsor and on his return Bok landed at Nazeing Common, North London 30 minutes later.
By careful organisation 100,000 letters and postcards addressed to nearly every country in the world were delivered using a total of 720 flying miles.
A feature of the aviation fortnight was to be the first airmail flight in South Africa, an official mail service with the consent of the Ministry of Posts and Telegraphs, based on the Hendon to Windsor flights a few months before. This post was opened on Thursday, December 21 and closed at 8pm on 26 December 1911.
The mail was limited to special copyright postcards depicting Bok’s Bleriot monoplane flying over Cape Town with Table Mountain in the background.
The first airmail flight in South Africa was scheduled for the morning of December 27, but was postponed because of heavy rain and so Bok took off at 7.15pm from Kenilworth racecourse, landing at Oldham’s Field in Muizenberg seven and a half minutes later. He handed over the mail to the local postmaster, listened to congratulatory speeches and then took on board the Kenilworth mailbags for the return flight, which he accomplished in twelve and a half minutes. A large crowd gave South Africa’s first aerial postman a great reception as he landed. This made him the only aviator to have flown the inaugural airmail service in two countries.
Bok flew a second mail from Kenilworth to Muizenberg on 2 January 1912.
In 1914 Bok went to England and was given a commission in the Royal Flying Corps. In 1915 he was sent to German South West Africa (now Namibia) as a military pilot, but a year later he began to suffer ill health. He died on his farm in Tylden near Ladysmith in Natal on 22 July 1946.
The next time you leave Surfers’ Corner, Muizenberg, in your Kombi with the longboards strapped to the roof and your bronzed beach babe staring adoringly at you from the passenger seat, take a moment to find the Police Museum on Main Road. As you travel towards Kalk Bay it is on your right. The building was originally the post office and was where the first airmail was delivered. If you route northwards out of Muizenberg on Main Road, you will find Oldham Field, between the road and Zandvlei, opposite the old railway station where Bok landed with the first South African airmail 100 years ago.
The flying gene runs deep in Bok’s family. He used to take his son, Lynne, flying from the age of three, which so shocked his wife, Minnie, that she eventually remarried a sensible, non-flying type, Dr Harold “Heli” Jowitt. Having flown at such a young age in 1912, Lynne outlived anyone else who had flown that long ago.
Lynne Driver-Jowitt’s son, Jon Driver-Jowitt, is a renowned orthopaedic surgeon in Newlands and has flown glider and powered aircraft recreationally his whole life. Jon’s son, Simon Driver-Jowitt, was a southern African bush pilot with many a tale to tell, and now flies Boeing 747-400s for Nippon Cargo Airlines. Jon, Simon and I all learnt to fly powered aircraft on Z-MFC, a J3 cub owned by the Mashonaland Flying Club at Charles Prince Airport in Harare. I hope that my children Ashleigh, Nicholas and Kai, will one day do the same.
Ab-initio instruction, many happy years flying to the most beautiful parts of the Southern African bush and the RV-8 ZU-LUS that I have built, bear testament to the crazy aviation fanaticism with which I, Bok’s other great-grandson, am joyfully afflicted. Nearly 14 happy years flying most of the types for SAA are also a dream come true.
I find it fascinating that Bok’s Bleriot monoplane and the RV-8 share the same configuration a century apart!
|

Please click here to download the registration review table.
Reg Review - Dec 2011
To all our readers, a very happy and prosperous 2012. I must first of all thank all those who help me to compile this review: Monica Knoetze at the CAA, Ian Burnett of Air Britain and AVDEX; without their help my life would be a lot more difficult. Also to all the folks who have allowed me to use their photographs to illustrate this column, many thanks. It is also great to know that in general aviation we had a safe festive season. Let’s keep 2012 this way as well.
There are not a lot of amendments this month as it’s the end of the year and everybody is in holiday mode. The Hawker Beechcraft types are still in big demand with no less than five coming onto the register this month. Not all of them are new aircraft - in fact most of them are used, showing that there is still a significant market for these stalwarts.
Of note are two Embraer EMB-135BJs that have come onto the register. There are also two hot air balloons registered this month.
SAA is continuing to upgrade their fleet, and another Airbus A330-243 was added this month. Cause for great excitement of course is the batch of new Airbus A320s that SAA is getting in 2012. The first of these has been painted in SAA colours at the factory, and is scheduled for delivery in early to mid-January, provisionally the 12th January. Watch this space.
On the deletions side, two more of SA Express’s Dash 8s have left our shores for the USA, as new aircraft replace them on the fleet. A Eurocopter AS350B3 has gone to Kenya.I wonder if this was the Kenya Police one that I saw in Eurocopter’s hangar a month or so ago. The Boeing 737 that was used to inaugurate SANTACO’s airline has been exported to Botswana to fly for a new scheduled operator: Blue Sky Airways, which is a subsidiary of the Christian Flying Mission.
On the NTCA side there is steady growth, with two more Slings, a Yak 18T and a Tiger Moth coming onto the register. The Tiger Moth is that well known Eastern Cape resident ZS-CID which has been registered into the NTCA category. There is also an Aerospatiale Gazelle registered this month – that makes two of them by my reckoning which are now resident here in SA. This Gazelle has seen quite a bit of service with the Israeli and Syrian defence forces as well as having been used in Israel on the civil side, and lastly in Hungary – she certainly has been around the Middle East.
I sincerely hope that 2012 will be a better year than 2011. Everybody seems to agree that 2011 was a tough year. I’d really like to see some more war birds coming into the country – a Spitfire would be fantastic! (Who knows? – this may yet come true).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|